Machine Learning-Based Detection of Icebergs in Sea Ice and Open Water Using SAR Imagery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Icebergs pose significant risks to shipping, offshore oil exploration, and underwater pipelines. Detecting and monitoring icebergs in the North Atlantic Ocean, where darkness and cloud cover are frequent, is particularly challenging. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) serves as a powerful tool to overcome these difficulties. In this paper, we propose a method for automatically detecting and classifying icebergs in various sea conditions using C-band dual-polarimetric images from the RADARSAT Constellation Mission (RCM) collected throughout 2022 and 2023 across different seasons from the east coast of Canada. This method classifies SAR imagery into four distinct classes: open water (OW), which represents areas of water free of icebergs; open water with target (OWT), where icebergs are present within open water; sea ice (SI), consisting of ice-covered regions without any icebergs; and sea ice with target (SIT), where icebergs are embedded within sea ice. Our approach integrates statistical features capturing subtle patterns in RCM imagery with high-dimensional features extracted using a pre-trained Vision Transformer (ViT), further augmented by climate parameters. These features are classified using XGBoost to achieve precise differentiation between these classes. The proposed method achieves a low false positive rate of 1% for each class and a missed detection rate ranging from 0.02% for OWT to 0.04% for SI and SIT, along with an overall accuracy of 96.5% and an area under curve (AUC) value close to 1. Additionally, when the classes were merged for target detection (combining SI with OW and SIT with OWT), the model demonstrated an even higher accuracy of 98.9%. These results highlight the robustness and reliability of our method for large-scale iceberg detection along the east coast of Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".