MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407758053 · doi:10.1080/03610918.2025.2455413

An efficient algorithm for the weighted elastic net penalized quantile regression

2025· article· en· W4407758053 on OpenAlexaff
Rui Zhang, Jun Fan, Lian Yi, Ailing Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Hebei ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsElastic net regularizationQuantile regressionQuantileAlgorithmRegressionComputer scienceMathematicsNet (polyhedron)Artificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Statistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sparse penalized quantile regression can be effectively used to perform variable selection in high-dimensional data analysis. Motivated by the high-correlations among variables that are often induced by the high dimensionality, We propose the weighted elastic net penalized quantile regression model that combines the strengths of the quantile loss and the weighted elastic net. The computation of sparse penalized quantile regression problems remain a challenge, due to its non-smooth loss function. In this paper, we develop an efficient algorithm based on the alternating direction method of multiplier from the dual perspective and analyze the iteration complexity. This paper also establishes the global convergence and the local convergence rates for the algorithm under certain assumptions. Numerical examples are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm and the favorable finite sample performance of the proposed model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.639
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.188
GPT teacher head0.516
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in Statistics - Simulation and ComputationSame topicStatistical Methods and InferenceFrench-language works237,207