MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407760432 · doi:10.15420/icr.2024.15

Gadolinium-guided Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in a Patient with Renal Impairment and a History of Severe Allergic Reaction to Iodinated Contrast Media

2025· article· en· W4407760432 on OpenAlexaff
Bandar Alshehri, Hussein Alamri, Naif Saad ALGhasab, Jamal Uddin Ahmed, Fahad Alshehri, Sondos Samargandy, Abdulrahman Almoghairi

Bibliographic record

VenueInterventional Cardiology Reviews Research Resources · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIodinated contrastMedicineIodinated contrast mediaGadoliniumAcute kidney injuryAllergic reactionContrast (vision)RadiologyInternal medicineAllergyComputed tomography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iodinated contrast media is integral to the evaluation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation; however, some patients may have contraindications to the use of iodinated contrast media. The study reports successful use of a gadolinium-based contrast agent in a patient with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, contrast allergy and post-contrast acute kidney injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.299
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterventional Cardiology Reviews Research ResourcesSame topicCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207