Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rose's philosophical project of critical Marxism articulated the subjective aspect of revolutionary practice by turning to Hegel's speculative exposition of religion and politics. The question of revolutionary faith was, however, left unanswered. This article demonstrates that Rose's later engagement with Kierkegaard, motivated by her Marxist-Hegelian theory of revolutionary subjectivity, answers this question. It begins by outlining Rose's critique of Marxist voluntarism as the materialist deployment of Fichte's idealist faith. This is followed by a reconstruction of Rose's speculative response to the dualism presupposed in such abstract faith, a response worked out in trinitarian theological and triune philosophical terms. Specifically, Rose forges a conceptual mediation between her Marxian theory of revolutionary praxis and Kierkegaardian concrete faith through Hegel's Logic, while also accounting for the existential experience of this mediation through the phenomenology of the leap of faith. The paper ends by showing how revolutionary faith addresses the dangers of political inversions attendant to Marxist subjectivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it