MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407762421 · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000006002

Being Human: Envisioning the Future of Museum-Based Education for Health Professionals

2025· article· en· W4407762421 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sean Tackett, Kamna S. Balhara, Toni Ungaretti, Philip Yenawine, Margaret S. Chisolm

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademic Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmpathy and Medical Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProfessional developmentOpenness to experienceAmbiguityEmpathyMedical educationPublic relationsHigher educationHealth professionalsSociologyPedagogyHealth carePolitical sciencePsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: The arts and humanities are fundamental to health professions education and can substantially enhance clinician empathy, tolerance for ambiguity, and openness to new perspectives. Museum-based education for health professionals (MBE-HP) has particular potential to achieve these aims but remains a nascent field of practice and study. To catalyze the growth of MBE-HP, a convening of 50 individuals from the United States and Canada, including museum educators and health professions educators, administrators, researchers, and learners, as well as patrons of the arts, was held for 3 days in December 2023 in Washington, DC. Activities included 7 distinct MBE-HP experiences at 5 national museums as well as facilitated discussions. This article describes the purpose and design of this unique gathering and summarizes its key outcomes. Through their shared experiences and discussions, participants developed a definition of MBE-HP as an approach that can occur in museums, other in-person settings, and/or online, which is informed by museum-based education adapted for health professional learners and involves exploring and/or creating visual and other forms of art, as well as individual and group reflection on these activities. Participants also developed strategies to advance MBE-HP and steps that can be taken by individuals, programs, and institutions involved in health professions education, as well as changes that may influence health professions education systems, such as professional organizations' sponsorship, private and public funding, evidence generation through research, and changes to regulations and policymaking. Museum-based education for health professionals is reaching critical mass, backed by science and supported by an increasing collection of resources for health professions educators; the definitions and strategies outlined here may be of value to stakeholders seeking to move MBE-HP into the mainstream to realize its potential to benefit learners, educators, patients, and communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0200.023
Scholarly communication0.0190.012
Open science0.0030.029
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.417 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademic MedicineSame topicEmpathy and Medical EducationFrench-language works237,207