MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407762676 · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.129653

NeRF dynamic scene reconstruction based on motion, semantic information and inpainting

2025· article· en· W4407762676 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurocomputing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaKey Technologies Research and Development ProgramNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsInpaintingComputer visionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMotion (physics)Image (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we address the inherent limitations of Neural Radiance Field (NeRF) in synthesizing novel viewpoints within dynamic environments, particularly those compromised by moving objects. Such scenarios frequently yield reconstructions of suboptimal quality, characterized by blurriness and the presence of artifacts, which significantly undermines the fidelity of synthetic scenes. This limitation significantly restricts the potential applications of NeRF in autonomous driving contexts, such as scene editing, high-precision map construction, and related functionalities. To overcome these challenges, we propose a novel NeRF-based approach tailored to address the complexities associated with moving objects in monocular driving scenarios. The proposed approach combines optical flow analysis and semantic information to precisely detect and localize moving objects. This was then followed by an inpainting technique that guides the NeRF reconstruction process, effectively mitigating the adverse impacts of dynamic elements within the scene. Our model is further enhanced by incorporating depth and semantic data to refine the training process. We validate the efficacy of our approach through comprehensive experimentation on both synthetic and real-world driving datasets, as well as on challenging self-recorded realistic driving scenes. Our method achieves a performance improvement of up to 13% compared to previous state-of-the-art methods. Additionally, we verify the efficacy of our approach through comprehensive ablation analyses. Both the quantitative and qualitative results demonstrate the superiority especially in dynamic driving scenes, advancing the potential applications in autonomous driving contexts. Our code and self-collected data are available at https://github.com/GandalfTGrey/Nerf-KBS.git .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it