MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Performance Legitimacy and Coercion in the Authoritarian States of East and Southeast Asia

2025· book-chapter· en· W4407764838 on OpenAlexaff
Erik Martinez Kuhonta

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Press eBooks · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Studies and History
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuthoritarianismLegitimacyCoercion (linguistics)Southeast asiaPolitical scienceEast AsiaDevelopment economicsPolitical economyAncient historySociologyHistoryChinaLawEconomicsPhilosophyDemocracyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In defiance of the Third Wave of democratization, authoritarian regimes remain prevalent in East and Southeast Asia. This chapter argues that authoritarianism in East and Southeast Asia has persisted on the basis of performance legitimacy and coercion. Through comparative historical analysis, the chapter argues that there are, broadly speaking, two types of authoritarianism in Pacific Asia: a purely coercive type that uses state violence to maintain power; and a developmental type that combines performance legitimacy with the deployment of coercion, especially through institutional mechanisms. This chapter argues that it is this latter type—an “authoritarian developmental state”—that especially distinguishes East and Southeast Asia as world regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Press eBooksSame topicAsian Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207