MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407770909 · doi:10.26565/2410-7360-2024-61-11

Urban integration of forced migrants: lessons from Canada and Ukraine

2024· article· en· W4407770909 on OpenAlex
Daria Venhryn

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVisnyk of V N Karazin Kharkiv National University series Geology Geography Ecology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration and Labor Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForced migrationPolitical scienceGeographyRefugeeLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Statement of the problem. Active hostilities began in Ukraine, leading to the imposition of a state of war in the country on 24 February 2022. This has resulted in a mass displacement, with citizens leaving their homes in search of safety and protection. Currently, 3.6 million people have left Ukraine, while 6.5 million people are internally displaced. These unprecedented migration flows have created immense challenges for both the displaced populations and the host communities that strive to accommodate them. In the face of extraordinary challenges, Canada was one of the first countries to come to Ukraine's aid. The Canadian government facilitated the visa process for Ukrainians, allowing them to migrate to Canada. The aim of the work is to analyze and evaluate the impact of migrants on urban development, focusing on the cases of Ukraine and Canada. Methods. In the course of the research and preparation of the article, the author used methods of analysis and synthesis, comparative-geographical and comparative-historical approaches, as well as the method of generalization. Results. This article delves into two critical aspects of Ukrainian migration during the ongoing war: internal displacement within Ukraine and international migration to Canada. We analyze the settlement patterns of migrants and the pressure they exert on cities. The geographical distribution is diverse. IDPs settle both in cities near the frontlines and in western regions in Ukraine. Despite all the risks, Kyiv the capital city of Ukraine, remains highly attractive. When relocating to Canada, migrants are guided by two factors: either having acquaintances, relatives, or friends already living there, or simply choosing a well-known large city. As research indicates, various sectors of urban infrastructure and services face challenges and opportunities under the influence of migration. Canada demonstrates effective integration through its well-developed laws, inclusive policies, and support systems that protect migrants' rights, fight discrimination, and provide essential services. The Ukrainian diaspora plays a significant role in this process by helping newcomers adapt. Ukraine's experience with internal migration caused by armed conflict shows the country's challenges in managing large-scale resettlement. The lack of housing, jobs, and social services pushed local authorities to respond quickly to the situation and learn from the practices of other countries. Our analysis underscores the need for strategic planning and investment to ensure sustainable urban development in the face of large-scale migration. Understanding the implications of these movements is essential for building resilient communities and addressing the complex challenges posed by displacement. The novelty. For the first time, the readiness of Canadian and Ukrainian cities to accommodate migrants was compared. Furthermore, the study analyzed how various sectors of urban infrastructure and services adapt to challenges and take advantage of opportunities created by migration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it