MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407779715 · doi:10.1590/s0034-759020250204x

DESEMPENHO DAS PME E CRIAÇÃO DE EMPREGO NA ÁFRICA SUBSAARIANA: PAPEL DA INOVAÇÃO DIGITAL

2025· article· pt· W4407779715 on OpenAlexaff
Oluwasegun Abraham Solaja, Ola Olusegun Oyedele, Oluwapemi John Olajugba, Abolaji Joachim Abiodun, Ogheneofejiro Edewor, Omobolanle Omotayo Solaja, Oluwatimilehin Victoria Kehinde, Faith Oluwatobiloba Akerele

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Administração de Empresas · 2025
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovation and Knowledge Management
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESUMO O presente estudo investiga a relação entre a inovação digital, o desempenho das pequenas e médias empresas (PMEs) e a criação de emprego na África Subsaariana (SSA). Examina também a forma como o desempenho das PMEs medeia a relação entre a inovação digital e a criação de emprego. Utilizando dados obtidos de 655 PMEs na SSA, descobrimos que a inovação digital tem potencial para ajudar as PMEs a criar empregos e melhorar o seu desempenho. Nossa análise confirmou o papel mediador do desempenho das PMEs na relação entre a inovação digital e a criação de emprego; constatamos que a inovação digital está significativamente associada à melhoria do desempenho das PMEs, o que, por sua vez, aumenta a sua capacidade de criação de emprego. Este estudo contribui para a literatura ao apresentar evidências empíricas sobre o papel da inovação digital na criação de emprego e no desempenho das PMEs e o papel mediador do desempenho das PMEs na relação entre a inovação digital e a criação de emprego.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Administração de EmpresasSame topicInnovation and Knowledge ManagementFrench-language works237,207