Carbon Dioxide Selectivity over Ethane in Promising Bis Tri (Fluoromethylsulfonyl) Imide-Based Ionic Liquids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research addresses the critical challenge of CO2 capture by exploring innovative ways to avoid ethane (C2H6) co-absorption in natural gas sweetening operations. The solubility of Ethane (C2H6) was measured in three ionic liquids (ILs) with similar anions, 1-decyl-3-methyl imidazolium bis (trifluoro methylsulfonyl imide) [IL-1], 1-hexadecyl-3-methylimidazolium bis (trifluoro methylsulfonyl imide) [IL-2], and triethytetra-decyl ammonium bis (trifluoromethylsulfonyl imide) [IL-3]. The solubility experiments were investigated at 303.15 K and 343.15 K with pressures reaching 1.2 MPa. Among the ILs, [IL-2] exhibited the highest ethane absorption capacity due to its extended alkyl chain. The Peng-Robinson equation of state (PR-EoS) and three (3) distinct mixing rules provided robust correlations for the solubility data. Results demonstrate the inferior performance of [IL-1], [IL-2], and [IL-3] compared to Selexol/Genosorb 1753. The selectivity of Ethane (C2H6) over CO2 was determined, with the overall selectivity ranking as follows: [IL-1] > [IL-3] > [IL-2]. A comparison of these selectivity values with published IL data indicated that these three ILs are most effective when used in applications targeting CO2 capture in the absence of Ethane (C2H6), such as in the case of flue gas. They will most probably be used with an amine blend. Additionally, the Enthalpy and entropy of absorption provided valuable insights, demonstrating Ethane’s weaker interactions and lower solubility than CO2. These findings emphasize the critical role of IL structure in determining ethane solubility and highlight the potential of customized ILs for optimizing gas-separation processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".