MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407782471 · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2025.3544057

Generalized Carrier-Based Modulated Power Control Scheme for Asymmetrical Dual-DC-Port DC-AC Converter in Battery Integrated PV Systems

2025· article· en· W4407782471 on OpenAlexaff
Jiangfeng Wang, Jingtian Shi, Cheng Xue, Xin Li, Wu Chen, Yunwei Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersJiangsu Key Laboratory of Smart Grid Technology and EquipmentNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDual (grammatical number)Electrical engineeringPhotovoltaic systemFlyback converterElectronic engineeringPower (physics)Battery (electricity)Port (circuit theory)EngineeringControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceVoltageBoost converterPhysicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The asymmetrical dual-dc-port dc-ac converter features high integration, high efficiency, and low cost in battery integrated photovoltaic (PV) systems, due to the single-stage power conversion for PV and battery simultaneously. However, the voltage variation of both PV and battery causes the asymmetrical characteristics of the converters and leads to the difficulties of the modulation strategy. Moreover, the control target requires flexible regulation of the power flow among different ports within the single-stage converter. To address these challenges, a generalized carrier-based modulated power control scheme (GCBM-PCS) is proposed for the asymmetrical dual-dc-port dc-ac converter. The generalized structure contains the outer power control loop and inner modified carrier-based pulsewidth modulation (CB-PWM) with zero-sequence injection. The proper zero-sequence component is regulated by the outer power control loop. By introducing the asymmetrical carriers, the modulation is adaptive to the dc-port voltage variation. Besides, the relationship of the power distribution among different ports in terms of the variable dc-port voltages and controllable zero-sequence components of the proposed GCBM-PCS is quantitatively analyzed. The control algorithm is easy to be implemented by digital controllers. The effectiveness of the proposed power control scheme and modulation strategy is validated by experimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.541
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power ElectronicsSame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207