MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407783047 · doi:10.2514/1.j063825

Estimation of Pressure Leakage Severity for Space Habitats Using Extended Kalman Filter

2025· article· en· W4407783047 on OpenAlex
Motahareh Mirfarah, Alana Lund, Shirley J. Dyke

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterLeakage (economics)Extended Kalman filterControl theory (sociology)MathematicsEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extraterrestrial habitat systems face numerous disruptions throughout their lifecycle, which may threaten crew safety. One serious risk is associated with air pressure leakage, which can occur due to sudden events such as micrometeorite strikes or airlock failures. To ensure proper functionality of the habitat, it is essential to detect the leak and assess its severity, quantified in terms of the leakage area, and communicate that information to the health management system in a meaningful way to support decision-making. A quantitative prediction of the remaining time before the detected fault results in system failure; its time-to-critical is also helpful for making decisions in such a resource-constrained environment. This paper presents a systematic study to develop and examine methods to estimate the current state of a pressurized vessel and predict the time-to-critical. To achieve this estimate in a real-time setting, an augmented extended Kalman filter method is used in conjunction with two noise identification procedures, namely, expectation maximization and variational Bayes. The robustness of the extended Kalman filter method, whether used independently or in conjunction with the expectation maximization or variational Bayesian approaches, is evaluated through a numerical study. The numerical study yields practical strategies for tuning the algorithm hyperparameters so as to obtain more rapid, accurate, and unbiased estimates of the fault intensity and the remaining time-to-critical. The performance and efficiency of these strategies are then experimentally validated by determining the leakage area and time-to-critical in a lab-scale pressure vessel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.686
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it