The role of Apolipoprotein E4 on cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease and Parkinsonisms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cognitive impairment is a prevalent non-motor symptom of Parkinson’s disease (PD), increasing the risk of dementia as the disease progresses. Despite its clinical significance, the etiology of cognitive impairment in PD remains unclear. Apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4), a well-known genetic risk factor of Alzheimer’s disease, has been studied for its potential role in PD-related cognitive impairment. However, findings have been conflicting and thus inconclusive, highlighting a need to critically evaluate the current research. Several studies using neuroimaging modalities have explored the brains of individuals with PD and atypical parkinsonian disorders who have APOE4. Some of these studies have identified distinct neuropathological changes that have been previously reported to be associated with cognitive impairments in those with Parkinsonisms. Here, we review the role of APOE4 on cognitive impairment in PD and atypical Parkinsonisms using neuroimaging evidence. We will examine how APOE4 may contribute to pathological changes within the brain and its association with cognitive impairment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".