A Machine Learning and Quantum Chemistry Approach for Identifying Prebiotic Molecules in the Interstellar Medium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The discovery of molecules in the interstellar medium (ISM) plays a key role in understanding prebiotic chemistry. Relatively few (~250) molecules have been confirmed in the ISM, and detecting additional species is crucial for expanding our knowledge of astrochemical processes. We present a strategy for predicting possible prebiotic molecules in the ISM that combines machine learning and high-accuracy quantum chemistry calculations. Using a reaction dataset of over 153,000 possible combinations of known interstellar molecules, we applied a machine learning model to estimate reaction energy barriers and identify those with low or zero barriers that are most likely to occur in the ISM. From this screening process, 24 molecules were identified, five of which have already been observed in interstellar space. For the remaining 19 molecules, we conducted density functional theory (DFT) and coupled cluster theory calculations to determine the most stable conformers, spectroscopic parameters, and predict their detectability through spectroscopy. We present data to guide future observational searches for new interstellar species, contributing to the ongoing exploration of complex organic molecules in space and their potential role in prebiotic chemistry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".