MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407806798

Projective Unification in Bi-Intuitionistic Logic

2025· preprint· en· W4407806798 on OpenAlexaff
Damiano Fornasiere, Quentin Gougeon, Miguel Martins

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Canadian institutionsMila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnificationProjective testPure mathematicsMathematicsIntuitionistic logicAlgebra over a fieldDiscrete mathematicsComputer scienceProgramming languagePropositional calculus
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The bi-intuitionistic propositional calculus bi-IPC is the natural symmetric extension of the intuitionistic logic IPC. We provide both an axiomatic and semantic characterization of the consistent axiomatic extensions of bi-IPC which admit projective unification. They are exactly those which contain a theorem of the form (¬ ∼)n p → (¬ ∼)^{n+1} p, for some n ∈ N -or, equivalently, which are valid on Kripke frames of n-bounded zigzag depth, a simple order-theoretic condition. We also prove that bi-IPC does not have a unitary unification type by showing that while the formula ¬ ∼p → (¬ ∼) p is a unifiable formula in bi-IPC, it cannot have a most general unifier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicLogic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeFrench-language works237,207