MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407816084 · doi:10.3389/ijph.2025.1608367

Editorial: Hunger, Food Sovereignty and Public Health

2025· editorial· en· W4407816084 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Janeth Mosquera, Lyda Osório

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Public Health · 2025
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic healthEnvironmental healthSovereigntyPolitical scienceMedicinePoliticsLawNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The escalating environmental and social crises have long warned of worsening challenges related to food security and sovereignty (1). However, the COVID-19 pandemic revealed the fragility of food systems across geographic scales. In Latin America, 247.8 million people in 2022 were forced to reduce the quality or quantity of their food, experienced hunger, or went days without eating (2). The current climate crisis has emerged as a significant public health challenge due to its direct and indirect impacts on various dimensions of well-being. Notably, the second goal of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals-"Zero Hunger"increasingly appears unattainable, partly because of climate change (3). Unsurprisingly, the impacts of climate change are unevenly distributed across regions and social groups. For example, 95% of crops in Africa rely on rainfall for irrigation, making the continent particularly vulnerable to climate variability, such as unpredictable rainfall patterns. Conversely, California irrigates 90% of its crops with advanced technology, yet much of this agricultural production is industrial (4).Hunger is not merely an environmental or technical issue-it is a political one. Decisions made by those in power directly affect what families can place on their tables daily. While technological innovations play a role in increasing food production, addressing hunger requires broader measures. These include ensuring adequate and sufficient land for food cultivation (e.g., agrarian reform), promoting agroecological models that counter industrial monocultures, protecting marine ecosystems, and advancing fair trade in food markets. States must also confront violence against environmental leaders and improve public awareness, as misinformation about the climate crisis, its drivers, and the role of the agribusiness industry continues to spread through mass media and social networks (5).In response to these challenges, international technical cooperation agencies have proposed various agendas to mitigate global hunger. Meanwhile, communities persist in their resistance and develop collaborative initiatives to ensure food security in rural and urban areas. For example, La Vía Campesina continues to advocate for food sovereignty, while agroecological family farming initiatives are gaining momentum in rural Colombia (6). This special issue features seven papers that explore diverse strategies and innovations aimed at addressing the multifaceted challenges of hunger and public health. They highlight how to integrate food insecurity into routine clinical care to improve risk assessment and management in patients (7); examine the unique challenges of food insecurity faced by older women, less educated individuals and those in impoverished geographic areas in Thailand (8); demonstrate that food bank users in Canada exhibit diverse strategies to cope with food insecurity (9), show how community initiatives (e.g. communal kitchens) proved more effective than food distribution platforms in addressing hunger and fostering social solidarity during the COVID-19 lockdown in Colombia (10); call for a paradigm shift from viewing recipients of nutrition programs as beneficiaries to acknowledging them as human rights holders and policy allies (11); and propose evidence-based strategies to eradicate hunger (12). Additionally, these papers serve as examples of measuring food insecurity and other relevant methods.The current food landscape is undeniably complex and demanding. Despite significant progress over recent decades, hunger remains a grim reality for millions. The guiding principle for addressing this challenge must be the universal right to food. Achieving this requires medium-term investments in early warning and rapid response systems to prevent and mitigate food crises, alongside long-term local and international actions grounded in environmentally respectful agroecological agriculture and the production of nutrient-rich foods. Let us strive for a world where food security is not a privilege but a fundamental right, achieved through collective commitment, equity, and sustainable practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.129

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.004
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0270.024
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.184
GPT teacher head0.491
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Public HealthSame topicFood Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsFrench-language works237,207