MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407820527 · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcaf085

Enlarged cavum septum pellucidum as a neuroimaging signature of head impact exposure

2025· article· en· W4407820527 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Suzie Kamps, Hugo L. Hempel, Suzan van Amerongen, Hannah de Bruin, Vikram Venkatraghavan, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Yolande A.L. Pijnenburg, Frederik Barkhof, Philip Scheltens, Rik Ossenkoppele, Everard G.B. Vijverberg

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthEisaiNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekZonMwAlzheimer NederlandEU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease ResearchNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchNorthern California Institute for Research and EducationHealth~HollandBioClinicaUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeBristol-Myers SquibbEli Lilly and CompanyBiogenCure Alzheimer's FundNational Institute on AgingAlzheimer's AssociationAmsterdam NeuroscienceStichting DioraphteFoundation for the National Institutes of Health
KeywordsDementiaFrontotemporal dementiaNeuroimagingNeuropsychologyConcussionPsychologyNeuropsychological assessmentChronic traumatic encephalopathyTraumatic brain injuryFrontotemporal lobar degenerationCohortMedicineAudiologyCognitionPsychiatryPoison controlInternal medicineDiseaseInjury prevention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cavum septum pellucidum (CSP) is commonly observed upon neuroimaging examination in individuals exposed to repetitive head impacts (RHI) and post-mortem in cases with chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Consequently, CSP has been proposed as a potential biomarker for RHI-related neurodegeneration, yet prevalence estimates of CSP across other neurodegenerative diseases and its clinical implications are largely unknown. We assessed CSP prevalence and clinical correlates in individuals with RHI exposure, a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI), a neurodegenerative disease (i.e. Alzheimer’s disease or frontotemporal dementia) and normal cognition. The primary group of interest, i.e. individuals exposed to RHI in contact sports or military service (n = 65; mean exposure 21.58 years), was compared against age- and sex-matched participants with TBI (n = 57; number of TBI range: 1–5) and non-exposed participants of the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort (Alzheimer’s disease, n = 30; frontotemporal dementia, n = 24; normal cognition, n = 27). Structural 3D brain MRI scans were visually rated for CSP grade (ranging 0–4) by two raters blinded to the clinical information. A CSP of at least Grade 2 was considered enlarged/abnormal. Inter-rater reliability was assessed with Cohens’ weighted Kappa (κ). We investigated whether prevalence of enlarged CSP differed between groups and assessed associations with neuropsychological outcomes (verbal memory, processing speed, mental flexibility and semantic fluency), neuropsychiatric symptoms (neuropsychiatric inventory), ventricular enlargement as measured with Evan’s index and MRI volumes of composite regions (limbic, temporal-meta regions and the whole brain). Inter-rater reliability was substantial [κ = 0.734 (95% confidence interval 0.67–0.80)]. An enlarged CSP was more often observed in the RHI group (44.6%) compared with individuals with Alzheimer’s disease [13.3%, odds ratio (OR) = 5.24 (1.79–19.26)], frontotemporal dementia [16.7%, OR = 4.03 (1.35–15.02)] and normal cognition [18.5%, OR = 3.54 (1.27–11.62)], all PFDR < 0.05, but not compared with the TBI group [29.8%, OR = 1.90 (0.90–4.06), PFDR = 0.094]. In those with RHI, enlarged CSP was associated with lower outcomes on verbal memory learning (η² = 0.09, PFDR = 0.023) and recall (η² = 0.08, PFDR = 0.030). For TBI, enlarged CSP was associated with lower performance on verbal memory learning; however, this lost significance after multiple comparison correction (η² = 0.014, PFDR = 0.09). Enlarged CSP was not associated with the composite MRI volumes, ventricular enlargement or neuropsychiatric symptoms. In summary, enlarged CSP was more prevalent in RHI-exposed individuals compared with individuals with a neurodegenerative disease or normal cognition, but not compared with TBI, and was associated with lower verbal memory performance in the RHI group. Our study highlights enlarged CSP as a potential consequence of long-term head impact exposure and, to a lesser extent, TBI, rather than a general consequence of neurodegeneration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.434
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain CommunicationsSame topicFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207