MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407822772 · doi:10.14800/iogr.1286

Study to Investigate the Potential of Coal Bed Methane (CBM) in Nigeria

2024· article· en· W4407822772 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueImproved Oil and Gas Recovery · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCoal Properties and Utilization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoalMethaneEnvironmental scienceWaste managementPetroleum engineeringMining engineeringGeologyEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing global demand for energy has led to a heightened interest in unconventional hydrocarbons, including coalbed methane (CBM), a type of natural gas found in coal deposits. This research explores the viability of utilizing CBM in Nigeria, focusing on four key basins, including Okpara, Onyeama, Okaba, and Owukpa basin. Key coal quality parameters, such as coal rank, depth, moisture content, ash content, and volatile matter, were analyzed and compared to data from prominent coal basins in the United States, Indonesia, China, India, Australia, and Canada. The findings indicate that Nigerian coal is predominantly sub-bituminous, with an average moisture content of 10.95% by weight and is located at relatively shallow depths. These characteristics suggest that Nigeria has significant potential for CBM production, positioning it as a promising alternative energy source for the country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImproved Oil and Gas RecoverySame topicCoal Properties and UtilizationFrench-language works237,207