MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407832872 · doi:10.1080/19396368.2025.2466687

Permeable cryoprotectants-free vitrification of human TESE, PESA and OAT spermatozoa: clinical outcomes

2025· article· en· W4407832872 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSystems Biology in Reproductive Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsCReATe Fertility Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVitrificationCryoprotectantCryopreservationAndrologyBiologyMedicineEmbryoFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cryopreservation of testicular and epididymal spermatozoa is more challenging in comparison to ejaculated spermatozoa due to lower sperm concentration and motility, and higher sperm sensitivity to cryoprotectants. Sperm vitrification without the use of potentially toxic permeable cryoprotectants is an attractive freezing alternative for testicular and epididymal spermatozoa, as well as oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT) samples. Our study is a retrospective analysis of outcomes in IVF cycles involving a total of 70 testicular, 77 epididymal and 69 ejaculated OAT samples vitrified in a closed double-straw device using mHTF medium supplemented with protein and sucrose, without any permeable cryoprotectant. In total, 71 frozen samples were used for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Results were compared to fresh samples (26 testicular, 53 epididymal and 63 ejaculated OAT samples) that served as controls. Elective single frozen embryo transfers of euploid or unknown-ploidy blastocysts were performed. While sperm motility is expected to diminish following slow sperm freezing and thawing, our data demonstrated that vitrification of testicular, epididymal and OAT samples had a mean motility rate comparable to fresh samples. No statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed between vitrified versus fresh TESE in fertilization (64.1% vs. 59.5%), blastocyst development (54.9% vs. 56.7%), blastocyst euploidy (36.4% vs. 33.3%), clinical pregnancy (47.8% vs. 36.4%) and live birth rates (43.5% vs. 24.2%). Similarly, vitrified versus fresh PESA showed no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) in the analyzed results respectively: (69.4% vs.74.9%; 62.6% vs. 59.7%; 40.5% vs. 48.1%; 36.0% vs.37.7%; and 32.0% vs. 27.5%). For vitrified OAT samples, there was a significant difference in blastocyst development and euploidy rates when compared to the control group. Our results demonstrate that human testicular, epididymal spermatozoa and samples with OAT can be successfully vitrified in small volumes in a closed system without using any permeable cryoprotectants, allowing utilization of this technique in clinical settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.893

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it