MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407836074 · doi:10.3986/9789610509516

Kanadskim sanjam naproti

2025· book· en· W4407836074 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Urška Strle

Bibliographic record

VenueMigracije · 2025
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The monograph ('Following the Canadian Dream: Towards a History of Slovenian Migration') by historian Urška Strle focuses on the migrations of Slovene men and women to Canada from the mid-19th century onward. The topic has not been the subject of many historiographical treatises although “the Slovenian diasporic community in Canada is lacking neither in terms of number nor traces left behind on Canadian society”, as put by the author herself. In its exposition, the book offers various historiographical, methodological and epistemological insights the author formed during her long tenure studying the topic at hand. The main part, however, focuses on a historiographical reconstruction of the migration processes. Such a focus allows a view on Canadian society, part of which Slovenian immigrants both became and shaped. The historiographical picture of Slovenian immigration to Canada is thus a contribution to the immigration history of Canada itself, which has never been the subject of a comprehensive study by the Slovenian historiography. Likewise, the book is also a contribution to Slovenian history due to the strong cultural, social, economic and political ties to their motherland kept by Slovenian Canadians.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMigracije→Same topicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics→French-language works237,207→