Investigating Muscle Electrophysiological Profiles after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Through Surface Electromyography Clustering Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Cervical spinal cord injuries (SCIs) result in significant neurological and functional impairments. Current clinical assessments, such as the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, provide essential diagnostic and prognostic insights but have limited sensitivity in detecting residual motor control. This study aims to investigate whether surface electromyography (sEMG) signals can reveal distinct electrophysiological profiles that complement clinical information, potentially enhancing the assessment of SCI. Methods: sEMG signals were recorded from 184 upper extremity muscle groups across 22 adult individuals with cervical SCI. Time and frequency domain features were extracted. Multiple clustering algorithms, including k-means, k-medoids, density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise, and hierarchical clustering, were applied to identify distinct sEMG profiles. Internal validation metrics (Silhouette scores) and resampling-based robustness assessments were used to confirm the reliability of the clusters. Identified clusters were evaluated for their associations with clinical variables, including neurological level of injury (NLI), American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale scores, myotome levels, manual muscle testing scores, and lower motor neuron injury status. Results: Distinct and reproducible clusters were identified, and significant associations were found between the sEMG clusters and clinical variables, particularly the myotome level and NLI. However, the clusters were not fully explained by clinical variables, indicating that sEMG may capture additional physiological nuances, such as residual motor pathways or compensatory mechanisms, that are not readily assessed through standard clinical evaluations. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that in individuals with cervical SCI, sEMG-based clustering identified distinct muscle electrophysiological profiles. These profiles are partially aligned with clinical variables. Yet the additional dimensions captured by sEMG may have the potential to enhance neurological assessments and improve the clinical management of SCI. These findings underscore the need for further research with larger and more diverse datasets to validate the clinical relevance of sEMG clusters and explore their implications for rehabilitation strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".