Resting-state fMRI reveals altered functional connectivity associated with resilience and susceptibility to chronic social defeat stress in mouse brain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chronic stress is a causal antecedent condition for major depressive disorder and associates with altered patterns of neural connectivity. There are nevertheless important individual differences in susceptibility to chronic stress. How functional connectivity (FC) amongst interconnected, depression-related brain regions associates with resilience and susceptibility to chronic stress is largely unknown. We used resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) to examine FC between established depression-related regions in susceptible (SUS) and resilient (RES) adult mice following chronic social defeat stress (CSDS). Seed-seed FC analysis revealed that the ventral dentate gyrus (vDG) exhibited the greatest number of FC group differences with other stress-related limbic brain regions. SUS mice showed greater FC between the vDG and subcortical regions compared to both control (CON) or RES groups. Whole brain vDG seed-voxel analysis supported seed-seed findings in SUS mice but also indicated significantly decreased FC between the vDG and anterior cingulate area compared to CON mice. Interestingly, RES mice exhibited enhanced FC between the vDG and anterior cingulate area compared to SUS mice. Moreover, RES mice showed greater FC between the infralimbic prefrontal cortex and the nucleus accumbens shell compared to CON mice. These findings indicate unique differences in FC patterns in phenotypically distinct SUS and RES mice that could represent a neurobiological basis for depression, anxiety, and negative-coping behaviors that are associated with exposure to chronic stress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".