MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407845924 · doi:10.1364/ol.551176

In-amplifier soliton self-frequency shift optimization by pre-chirping – experimental demonstration

2025· article· en· W4407845924 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Robi Kormokar, Md Faysal Nayan, Martin Rochette

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChirpOpticsAmplifierPhysicsFrequency shiftOptical amplifierSelf-phase modulationNonlinear opticsMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soliton self-frequency shift (SSFS) is a fundamental mechanism of optical wavelength conversion and supercontinuum generation. Often, it is desirable to use a nonlinear propagation design that provides a large amount of SSFS, leading to wavelength conversion with a large frequency offset or leading to a broad supercontinuum generation. The most effective approach to enhance SSFS is using an amplifying medium. In this context, it was theoretically predicted that a pre-amplified seed pulse should be chirped to maximize the extent of SSFS. Here, we make the experimental verification of this claim. For this purpose, a chirped seed pulse at a wavelength of 1880 nm is amplified and experiences SSFS in a Tm 3+ -doped fiber amplifier. The resulting soliton reaches a final wavelength that is tuned by adjusting the energy and chirp of the pre-amplified seed pulse. The experiment demonstrates that SSFS and energy conversion efficiency are maximized when the pre-amplified seed pulse is chirped at C 0 ≈ 0.65 g L D , where g L D is the total gain over one dispersion length. This research provides a fundamental conclusion for optimizing SSFS processes using any amplifying medium and finds applications for large offset wavelength conversion and broadband supercontinuum generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics LettersSame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207