MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407848534 · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108296

The stochastic behavior of electricity prices under scrutiny: Evidence from spot and futures markets

2025· article· en· W4407848534 on OpenAlexafffund
Jean‐François Bégin, Fabio Gómez, Katja Ignatieva, Han Li

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Economics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicStochastic processes and financial applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersAustralian Research CouncilAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Western AustraliaSimon Fraser University
KeywordsFutures contractScrutinySpot contractEconomicsSpot marketElectricityFinancial economicsEconometricsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article proposes a stochastic volatility jump–diffusion model for pricing electricity derivative contracts. The main objective is to develop a model that effectively captures the characteristics and stylized facts of the electricity spot market, such as mean reversion , changing expectations in the spot price’s long-run level, seasonality , extreme volatility, price spikes, and time-varying jump intensity. We employ a particle filter that relies on both spot prices and futures data to estimate model parameters. The results demonstrate that incorporating the aforementioned features is crucial for accurately fitting both spot and futures prices, as evidenced by data from the Australian electricity market.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy EconomicsSame topicStochastic processes and financial applicationsFrench-language works237,207