Scalar Interpolation: A Better Balance between Vector and Scalar Execution for SuperScalar Architectures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most compilers convert all iterations of a vectorizable loop into vector operations to decrease processing time. This paper proposes Scalar Interpolation, a technique that inserts scalar operations into vectorized loops to increase the utilization of execution units in processors with distinct pipelines for scalar and vector processing. Scalar interpolation inserts scalar operations for an entire iteration of the sequential loop to avoid data movements between vector and scalar registers. A challenge to introducing scalar interpolation is creating a static cost model to guide the compiler’s decision to interpolate scalar operations in a loop. An alternative to a static cost model is to perform auto-tuning in a loop to dynamically discover a sweet spot for the scalar interpolation factor. A performance study on an LLVM-based prototype reveals speedups of up to 30% on Intel Xeon (x86) with a static analysis of the cost model, and 43% on Kunpeng-920 (AArch64) with auto-tuning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".