Vectron: A Dynamic Programming Auto-vectorization Framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dynamic programming (DP) is a fundamental algorithmic strategy that decomposes large problems into manageable subproblems. It is a cornerstone of many important computational methods in diverse fields, especially in the field of computational genomics, where it is used for sequence comparison. However, as the scale of the data keeps increasing, these algorithms are becoming a major computational bottleneck, and there is a need for strategies that can improve their performance. Here, we present Vectron, a novel auto-vectorization suite that targets array-based DP implementations written in Python and converts them to efficient vectorized counterparts that can efficiently process multiple problem instances in parallel. Leveraging Single Instruction Multiple Data (SIMD) capabilities in modern CPUs, along with Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), Vectron delivers significant speedups, ranging from 10% to more than 20x, over the conventional C++ implementations and manually vectorized and domain-specific state-of-the-art implementations, without necessitating large algorithm or code changes. Vectron's generality enables automatic vectorization of any array-based DP algorithm and, as a result, presents an attractive solution to optimization challenges inherent to DP algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".