MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Measurement of soil variability for probabilistic slope stability analysis

2011· book-chapter· en· W4407857940 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Van Helden M. J., James Blatz, K. W. Bannister

Bibliographic record

VenueIOS Press eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStability (learning theory)Probabilistic logicEnvironmental scienceStatisticsGeologySoil scienceMathematicsComputer scienceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been known for some time that the factor of safety is of little physical significance. Attempting to predict future performance of geotechnical structures using the deterministic factor of safety is fraught with uncertainty and risk. Probabilistic analysis of slope stability can allow the quantification of the input parameter uncertainty and temporal forecasting to be more accurately achieved. Accounting for the spatial correlation structure of soil deposits is essential to proper estimation of probabilities of failure. The current study involves three-dimensional cluster analysis of Cone Penetration Testing with Pore-Pressure measurements (CPTu). The clustered data are to be used in an assessment of the autocorrelation statistics for lacustrine clay foundation soils of a water retention dyke. Dyke 17W is located at the McArthur Falls hydro-electric generating station owned and operated by Manitoba Hydro, located near Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. The results of the geostatistical analysis will be modeled as a random field in a probabilistic Monte-Carlo simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOS Press eBooksSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207