Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Beginning in 2016, American diplomats and family members posted to Havana, Cuba reported debilitating medical symptoms with no known physical cause. Many US officials labelled these as evidence of a new malady called ‘Havana syndrome’, caused by experimental weaponry deployed by hostile rival states. Since then, American personnel in numerous other countries have self-reported hundreds more cases. Despite no medical consensus on the cause or coherence of symptoms and no proof that such weaponry exists, US officials have consistently claimed that Havana syndrome is the result of directed attacks by hostile powers. I examine how, amid questions of US vulnerability and potential shifts in the global balance of power, Havana syndrome presents both a medical and a geopolitical diagnosis. The contested diagnosis and scripting of Havana syndrome reflects and propagates anxieties about American power, rewriting and enacting US geopolitical codes through sites and scales from the body to the globe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it