Transformative education for youth in Canada’s justice system: earning credits and gaining hope
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The combination of rehabilitation and education of young offenders in Canada who are incarcerated for serious offenses is generally less successful than for young offenders who are assigned to non-custodial diversion programs. This has become a matter of concern, especially as many young offenders are of Indigenous origin. Three current forms of education, however, point to distinct possibilities for enhancing the education of young detainees in the youth justice system. These are: (a) alternative schools that have long demonstrated the value of accommodating the unique psychological, social, and learning needs of students; (b) wilderness adventure therapy; and (c) Indigenous forms of teaching and learning. In this paper we present the case of a program for young offender detainees (ages 12–17), the Healing Outdoor Program and Education (HOPE),Footnote1 which adopted a holistic approach to young offender rehabilitation by combining the attributes of alternative schooling with wilderness adventure therapy and Indigenous practices. Although the HOPE program has since been terminated, it nonetheless demonstrated the possibilities of coordinated approaches to education and therapeutic healing designed to prepare young offenders for effective transitions back to their own communities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".