Empowering Language Learners in a Changing World through Pedagogies of Multiliteracies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This volume is an assemblage of conceptual explorations of multiliteracies pedagogies and empirical studies based on classroom practices that foster learner empowerment and agency in multiliteracies pedagogy-informed L2 education in varied academic contexts of the world.The volume weaves thirteen chapters organically to show how theory informs practice and how practice further advances theory.It begins with theoretical and conceptual explorations and analyses of pedagogical and philosophical orientations to multiliteracies in Chapters 1, 2 and 3 and unfolds select qualitative studies focusing on multiliteracies-anchored practices in the rest of the volume, collectively reinforcing the fact that recognition of learners' diverse and unique subjectivities, needs, and identities is a centrifugal force of learner empowerment and agency in their learning and literacies development relevant to the current social world.In the introductory chapter, Vander Tavares elucidates the theoretical underpinnings and conceptual principles of multiliteracies pedagogies that foreground the contributing chapters.In Chapter 2, Fei Victor Lim redefines literacies education in the era of diversifying linguistic landscape and media ecology, reconceptualizing multimodality in three dimensions of learning (i.e., multimodality for learning, multimodality as learning, and multimodality in learning) and identifying the desiderata (i.e., considerations for further investigation) for each dimension.In Chapter 3, Tavares critically synthesizes convergencies and divergencies between the New London Group's (1996) pedagogy of multiliteracies and Freirean educational philosophy.Despite the divergent temporal and spatial contexts and sociocultural and sociohistorical conditioning of the theoretical development of the two perspectives, they share a similar onto-epistemological stance, challenging essentialist ideologies and colonial discourses entrenched in many traditional language education se\ings.Delving into empirical studies that connect the dots of theory and practice, in Chapter 4, Kristen Michelson promotes an alternative lens to language assessment that validates learners' interests and agency in the designing of their own learning and assessment.Informed by two French as a second language (FSL) learner cases in university, Michelson argues for a paradigm shift toward process-based, learnercentric/bo\om-up assessment that embraces learners' subjectivities for meaningful language development for their lived realities.In Chapter 5, Noah Asher Golden provides a raciolinguistic analysis of a Mexican American learner's language-learning experience and critical discussions on contrasting ontoepistemological perspectives embedded in different language-learning models and projects, asserting that a raciolinguistic analysis in ELT is an incumbent means to challenge racist nativism.In Chapter 6, Susana Aparecida Ferreira discusses teacher professional development in Brazil that emphasized teachers' recognition of students' racial identities in teaching, contending that multiliteracies theory-informed practice orients teachers to organize their teaching to critically reflect and address learners' current sociocultural and sociopolitical learning conditions influenced by fast-evolving advent of technology and recurrent racism and other forms of injustice in the local and global contexts.Through a case study of a plurilingual FSL learner in Germany, in Chapter 7, Lisa Marie Brinkmann examines pedagogical effects of student-designed portfolios for the development of learner multiliteracies and agency, highlighting that student-generated multimodal and multiliterate design for language learning recognizes learners' diverse capabilities and creative potential leading to meaningful academic performance and achievement with learner-designed curricular goals and strategies.Leonardo Veliz and Eveline Chan continue this account of multiliteracies pedagogy with diversity-oriented perspectives in 103 Reference
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.017 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".