MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407866543 · doi:10.36991/philia.202408

Inschriften aus Milet II: Neues zu den Temeniten. Drei kaiserzeitliche Vereinsinschriften

2024· article· en· W4407866543 on OpenAlexaff
Philip EGETENMEIER

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Philia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient Near East History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article contains three new inscriptions from Miletos, all of which are related to the Teme­nitai. With the new inscriptions we now have evidence from the imperial period for this enigmatic association, which is only found in Miletos. These are all lists of names that were later supplemented by additional names. This phenomenon in particular is therefore also investigated in relation to the material that has already been published. The discussion of the new inscriptions is followed by some concluding considerations in which, on the basis of all known evidence regarding the Temenitai, an attempt is made to offer an explanation of what lies behind these lists of names and the character of these Milesian associations. Of particular interest are also the dating (stephanephoroi Lucius Malius Reginus and his son Lucius Malius Saturninus) as well as a very early case of an archisynagogos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.366
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PhiliaSame topicAncient Near East HistoryFrench-language works237,207