scDNAm-GPT Captures Genome-wide CpG Dependencies in Single-cell DNA methylomes to Revolutionize Epigenetic Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Single-cell DNA methylomes are challenging to interpret because of sparse CpG coverage and the complexity of genome-wide sequences. We present scDNAm-GPT, a universal foundation model that uses context-aware CpG tokenization, a Mamba backbone, and cross-attention to capture both local and global DNA methylation patterns. Trained on over one million single cells from 35 human and mouse tissues, scDNAm-GPT enables accurate cell clustering, zero-shot prediction of CpG effects on gene expression, improved trajectory inference, and reference-free deconvolution of cell types from cell-free DNA. The model hierarchically learns regulatory features, and its attention maps highlight functionally relevant regions, demonstrating high biological interpretability. These results establish scDNAm-GPT as a scalable and generalizable framework for single-cell epigenomic analysis, offering new opportunities to dissect epigenetic regulation in health and disease. Code is available at GitHub ( https://github.com/ChaoqiLiang/scDNAm-GPT ).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".