MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407870615 · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2025.122729

Optimization of hybrid renewable energy systems for remote communities in northern Canada

2025· article· en· W4407870615 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mohammadmehdi Hosseini, William David Lubitz, Syeda Humaira Tasnim, Shohel Mahmud

Bibliographic record

VenueRenewable Energy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingGeographyEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electricity is currently provided in remote communities in Nunavut, Canada, using diesel generators. This study aims to identify the most cost-effective hybrid renewable energy systems by integrating photovoltaic panels and wind turbines to reduce carbon emissions and fuel costs associated with diesel generation. Two system configurations are considered: fully renewable energy systems and hybrid systems incorporating diesel generators. A genetic algorithm-based optimization approach is used to determine the optimal wind farm layout while considering wake effects. The hybrid system achieved levelized costs of electricity (LCOEs) of 0.30 $/kWh in Arviat, 0.35 $/kWh in Rankin Inlet, 0.29 $/kWh in Baker Lake, and 0.37 $/kWh in Sanikiluaq, significantly reducing energy costs compared to diesel-only systems. Additionally, the optimized hybrid configurations led to over 55 % reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, while improving annual energy production by 20 % in Arviat and up to 15 % in Sanikiluaq. The study demonstrates that integrating wind and solar energy with existing diesel infrastructure provides a financially viable and environmentally sustainable pathway for energy transition in remote off-grid communities. These findings contribute to ongoing research on optimizing hybrid renewable energy systems for cold-climate regions, ensuring affordability, reliability, and emissions reduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenewable EnergySame topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207