MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407873202 · doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2025.106062

Simulation of time-dependent response of jointed rock masses using the 3D DEM-DFN modeling approach

2025· article· en· W4407873202 on OpenAlexafffund
Mingzheng Wang, Ming Cai

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversityCentre for Excellence in Mining Innovation
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeologyRock mass classificationGeotechnical engineeringDiscrete element methodMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Investigating the mechanical response of jointed rock mass, especially its potential changes over time, is vital for the design of geotechnical structures with a long service lifetime. This article studies time-dependent deformations of jointed rock masses based on the 3D distinct element method (DEM) incorporating discrete fracture networks (DFN). A new 3D creep model for jointed rock masses is developed, emphasizing the structural failure due to the creep sliding of joints while considering the long-term strength and the time-to-failure phenomenon of intact rocks. The creep sliding constitutive model of joints is developed based on Barton's nonlinear strength criterion. First, the model implementation, parameter calibration, and model validations are introduced. Then, a case study of the TAS08 tunnel in Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory (HRL) in Sweden is presented. A DFN model using field mapping data is constructed using Mofrac. The time-dependent response of the TAS08 tunnel is analyzed using the proposed creep model for jointed rock masses. Based on the simulation results, it show that the proposed approach can effectively simulate the time-dependent deformation of jointed rock masses. The DEM-DFN simulation approach provides a valuable tool for analyzing time-dependent responses of excavations and managing hazards associated with structurally controlled failures. • A new 3D creep model is developed for jointed rock masses considering the time-dependent deformation of both rock and joints. • Structurally controlled failure associated with creep deformations of discontinuities is simulated. • A DFN generation tool Mofrac is used to build the DFN model containing deterministic and stochastic fractures. • DEM-DFN modeling approach is adopted to analyze the time-dependent response of a tunnel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining SciencesSame topicRock Mechanics and ModelingFrench-language works237,207