MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407874166 · doi:10.1016/j.ghm.2025.02.003

Induced mechanism of tunnel rockbursts based on dynamic buckling of rock plates

2025· article· en· W4407874166 on OpenAlexafffund
Jian Deng, Yanglin Gong, Shaojun Li

Bibliographic record

VenueGeohazard Mechanics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBucklingMechanism (biology)Materials scienceStructural engineeringComposite materialGeologyGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rockburst, characterized by a sudden and violent rock failure resulting in the expulsion of rock from its surroundings, poses a significant threat to the safety of tunnel excavation operations, often causing property damage and injuries to workers. Buckling has been identified as a critical mechanism leading to rockbursts. Seismic events or blasting can induce rockbursts when stress waves reach the free surface of underground openings. This paper aims to investigate the induced mechanism of tunnel rockbursts based on the dynamic buckling of rectangular rock plates. As a rock stress wave approaches a tunnel sidewall, it decomposes into perpendicular and parallel component loads relative to the free surface. The perpendicular stress reflects off the free surface, forming a rectangular thin plate of rock. The parallel stress triggers parametric resonance in the plate, resulting in a tunnel rockburst. An illustrative example of tunnel sidewall rockbursts in Jinping II hydropower project, China, is provided to study the effects of stress wave amplitude and frequency, static and dynamic components, rock damping, multiple frequencies, and vibration modes. Based on this mechanism analysis, recommendations are proposed to mitigate the risk of tunnel rockbursts. The research offers a plausible explanation for the heightened frequency and severity of rockbursts in Tunnel Boring Machine tunnels compared to New Austrian Tunneling Method tunnels at the Jinping II project for the first time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeohazard MechanicsSame topicGeotechnical and Geomechanical EngineeringFrench-language works237,207