MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407874699 · doi:10.3354/meps14830

Molecular evidence of shipping noise impact on the blue mussel, a key species for the sustainability of coastal marine environments

2025· article· en· W4407874699 on OpenAlexafffund
Delphine Veillard, Stéphane Beauclercq, Nathan Ghafari, Andrea Arnold, Bertrand Génard, Lekha Sleno, Anne Choquet, DE Warschawski, Isabelle Marcotte, Réjean Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Ecology Progress Series · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
FundersAgence Nationale de la RechercheCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueEquipexUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
KeywordsMusselSustainabilityKey (lock)Blue musselEnvironmental scienceFisheryMarine speciesOceanographyEcologyBiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global anthropogenic oceanic noise caused by shipping is predicted to double every 11.5 yr, putting marine organisms at risk. While the impact of noise on marine mammals is well documented, its effects on molluscs, which hold immense economic and ecological importance, remain largely unknown. To investigate the consequences of noise on mollusc metabolism during crucial early life stages, blue mussel Mytilus edulis larvae were exposed to shipping noise in a laboratory setting until the post-larval stage and their metabolome was analysed. Multivariate analyses of the metabolome showed that shipping noise induced stress-related inflammation with increased energy demand, higher protein turnover, and disrupted nervous system activity. Consequently, noise promoted delayed metamorphosis in suboptimal habitats with greater metabolic costs, which may affect ecosystem and aquaculture sustainability as competent mussel larvae struggle to select suitable development habitats. Without action to limit underwater noise, such impacts could disrupt population structures and marine biodiversity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine Ecology Progress SeriesSame topicMarine animal studies overviewFrench-language works237,207