Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article interroge un angle mort relatif de la théorie des régimes urbains. Cette théorie, qui insiste sur la stabilité des coalitions territorialisées d’acteurs publics et privés qui pilotent l’action publique de développement des villes, est peu disserte quant à la façon dont ces régimes se construisent ou la façon dont ils se transforment. Comment passe-t-on d’un régime à un autre, c’est-à-dire à la fois d’une coalition à une autre et d’objectifs de développement à d’autres ? La thèse de cet article, qui s’appuie sur l’analyse de deux agglomérations françaises (Nantes et Rennes), est que la notion de travail politique, qui permet de désigner un ensemble, à la fois complexe et fragile, d’opérations visant à fabriquer des arguments et à construire des alliances, permet de mieux appréhender les processus de modification des régimes territoriaux de développement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".