MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407880814 · doi:10.3390/fi17030102

Metastable Substructure Embedding and Robust Classification of Multichannel EEG Data Using Spectral Graph Kernels

2025· article· en· W4407880814 on OpenAlexaff
Rashmi Nagawara Muralinath, Vishwambhar Pathak, Prabhat Mahanti

Bibliographic record

VenueFuture Internet · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSubstructureEmbeddingElectroencephalographyGraphMetastabilityPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionTheoretical computer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Classification of neurocognitive states from Electroencephalography (EEG) data is complex due to inherent challenges such as noise, non-stationarity, non-linearity, and the high-dimensional and sparse nature of connectivity patterns. Graph-theoretical approaches provide a powerful framework for analysing the latent state dynamics using connectivity measures across spatio-temporal-spectral dimensions. This study applies the graph Koopman embedding kernels (GKKE) method to extract latent neuro-markers of seizures from epileptiform EEG activity. EEG-derived graphs were constructed using correlation and mean phase locking value (mPLV), with adjacency matrices generated via threshold-binarised connectivity. Graph kernels, including Random Walk, Weisfeiler–Lehman (WL), and spectral-decomposition (SD) kernels, were evaluated for latent space feature extraction by approximating Koopman spectral decomposition. The potential of graph Koopman embeddings in identifying latent metastable connectivity structures has been demonstrated with empirical analyses. The robustness of these features was evaluated using classifiers such as Decision Trees, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest, on Epilepsy-EEG from the Children’s Hospital Boston’s (CHB)-MIT dataset and cognitive-load-EEG datasets from online repositories. The classification workflow combining mPLV connectivity measure, WL graph Koopman kernel, and Decision Tree (DT) outperformed the alternative combinations, particularly considering the accuracy (91.7%) and F1-score (88.9%), The comparative investigation presented in results section convinces that employing cost-sensitive learning improved the F1-score for the mPLV-WL-DT workflow to 91% compared to 88.9% without cost-sensitive learning. This work advances EEG-based neuro-marker estimation, facilitating reliable assistive tools for prognosis and cognitive training protocols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuture InternetSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207