MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407883806 · doi:10.12927/hcpol.2024.27475

A Canadian Call for Addressing Physical Health in Specialized Mental Health Settings

2024· article· en· W4407883806 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Cara Evans, Christopher Canning, Munazzah Ambreen, Brian Lo, Mary Rose van Kesteren, Caroline Walker, Vicky Stergiopoulous

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare policy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicObesity and Health Practices
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthWaypoint Centre for Mental Health Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthPhysical healthPsychologyGerontologyMedicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

, which promotes physical health monitoring in secondary and tertiary mental health settings. Health leaders in Canada can learn from reverse integration approaches that have been adopted or proposed in other jurisdictions. We conducted a jurisdictional scan and applied the 3I framework for policy analysis to suggest that Canadian adaptations of existing approaches should foreground equity, build on existing infrastructure and human resources and prioritize leadership of people with lived experience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.640

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0140.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.553
Teacher spread0.419 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare policySame topicObesity and Health PracticesFrench-language works237,207