MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407883808 · doi:10.1186/s13690-025-01502-w

Examining the association of psychosocial and health behaviors with life satisfaction among canadians: a nationally representative study

2025· article· en· W4407883808 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nigatu Regassa Geda, Leah E. Cahill, Cindy Feng

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosocialPublic healthHealth services researchQuality of Life ResearchLife satisfactionAssociation (psychology)MedicineGerontologyHealth informaticsEnvironmental healthDemographyPsychologyPsychiatryNursingSocial psychologySociologyPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Given life satisfaction is a key component or indicator of Quality of Life (QoL), previous studies in Canada have made some attempt to analyze its main determinants at population level. However, our knowledge of the association between psychosocial factors (e.g., sense of belongingness) and health behaviors (e.g., smoking, alcohol intake, and physical activity) and life satisfaction is limited. Understanding the associations between these key variables and life satisfaction is vital for informing interventions and improving well-being. This study aims to address this research gap by examining the relationships between psychosocial factors, health behaviors, and life satisfaction among Canadians aged 12 and above. METHODS: Data from the 2017-2018 Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) were utilized for this study, encompassing information from a large sample of 113,000 Canadians aged 12 and above. Generalized Ordered logistic regression models were employed to assess the association of psychosocial and physical health behaviors with life satisfaction. RESULTS: The study revealed significant associations between psychosocial factors, health behaviors, and life dissatisfaction among Canadians. Respondents living in moderately and severely food insecure households have 2.239 times (95% CI: 1.799-2.786) and 5.093 times (95% CI: 4.097-6.332) higher incidences of experiencing life dissatisfaction, respectively, compared to food-secured households. Respondents with a somewhat weak and very weak sense of belongingness had 2.635 times (95% CI: 2.048-3.391) and 6.740 times (95% CI: 5.210-8.717) higher chances, respectively, of falling into the life dissatisfaction category compared to being satisfied. Higher BMI and obesity were linked to increased life dissatisfaction, while physical activity exhibited a positive relationship with life satisfaction. Smoking was associated with higher levels of life dissatisfaction. CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the importance of considering both psychosocial factors and physical health behaviors in understanding life dissatisfaction among Canadians. The results suggest that interventions targeting social factors, such as promoting a sense of belongingness and addressing socioeconomic disparities, alongside efforts to promote healthy lifestyle behaviors, may contribute to improving subjective well-being and life satisfaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Public HealthSame topicPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionFrench-language works237,207