MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407885445 · doi:10.3390/engproc2025089009

CAVE Automatic Virtual Environment Technology: A Patent Analysis

2025· article· en· W4407885445 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAugmented Reality Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersMinistère de l'Économie, de l’Innovation et des Exportations du Québec
KeywordsPatent analysisComputer scienceCaveData scienceGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cave automatic virtual environment (CAVE) technology provides a highly immersive experience in virtual reality (VR) environments, transcending traditional boundaries of VR head-mounted devices. CAVE is applied to many fields, including education, construction, healthcare, and manufacturing. Despite its relevance, studies examining CAVE technology evolution and research directions are still lacking. To address this research gap, we analyzed patents using CAVE to understand the technology’s development and identify opportunities for future research, development, and innovation. Patent data were collected from the Lens database and analyzed using data mining techniques. An increasing number of CAVE patents were granted, reflecting significant growth and investments in this field. The results highlight emerging trends in the development of CAVE systems, emphasizing various technical configurations and innovative applications across a wide range of fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAugmented Reality ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207