MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407886062 · doi:10.1021/jacs.4c18175

Antifouling Spiky Nanoelectrodes Enhance Detection of Bacterial mRNA

2025· article· en· W4407886062 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yuhao Leo Wu, Jin Jia, Jagotamoy Das, Kimberly T. Riordan, Connor D. Flynn, Yi Wang, Shana O. Kelley, Teri W. Odom

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Graduate EducationDivision of ChemistryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInternational Institute for Nanotechnology, Northwestern University
KeywordsBiosensorNanotechnologyBiofoulingChemistryNanomaterialsElectrodeNanostructureMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nanomaterials have extensive applications in the development of sensitive biosensors, but the influence of their specific structural properties remains unclear. This work presents a platform that can provide mechanistic insight into how nanostructured electrodes improve the performance of electrochemical biosensors. We designed nanoelectrodes with sub-10 nm spike features through a combination of top-down lithography and solution-based synthesis. These anisotropic structures facilitated rapid electron-transfer, minimized biofouling, and promoted efficient target capture. Using these spiky nanoelectrodes in a biosensor, we detected bacterial mRNA at aM-levels and within 3 min. Our findings reveal the mechanism underlying signal enhancement from high-curvature regions on nanostructured electrodes, highlighting the structure-property relationships of nanostructures in electrochemical sensing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical Society→Same topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques→French-language works237,207→