Empowering social entrepreneurial intentions through experiential learning and self-efficacy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines the impact of experiential learning on social entrepreneurial intentions, refining a previous model by exploring self-efficacy as a mediating factor. Data from 437 final-year students at two Malaysian universities, where experiential learning methods such as business plan development and group work were integrated, were analyzed using PLS-SEM. Findings reveal that self-efficacy partially mediates the positive relationship between experiential learning and social entrepreneurial intentions. These insights support policymakers in embedding experiential learning within social entrepreneurship education to foster graduates' critical thinking, entrepreneurial skills, and commitment to sustainable, responsible management. The study advances theoretical discussions by extending Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory and Bandura's Social Learning Theory, particularly in non-Western contexts like Malaysia. Uniquely, it examines the interplay between experiential learning dimensions, self-efficacy, and social entrepreneurial intentions using a modified Kolb Learning Style Inventory integrated with social learning theory. This study introduces an innovative pedagogical approach integrating experiential learning, critical thinking, and sustainability into social entrepreneurship education, fostering ethical decision-making and responsible management while addressing a crucial gap in understanding how experiential learning develops socially responsible business leaders. • Experiential learning enhances social entrepreneurial intentions. • Self-efficacy mediates the link between experiential learning and entrepreneurial intent. • Kolb's and Bandura's frameworks integrate to explain social entrepreneurial motivation. • Emotion and reasoning in learning significantly influence entrepreneurial self-efficacy. • Gender differences influence the impact of experiential learning on entrepreneurial intent. This manuscript includes a complete description of all necessary ethics approvals . Approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of (the Research Ethics Board (REB) of HEC Montréal). The approval number provided by the committee is (2024–5906)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".