MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407897794 · doi:10.1139/cjps-2024-0233

CDC Huskie green field pea

2025· article· en· W4407897794 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Thomas D. Warkentin, Bunyamin Tar’an, Sabine Banniza, Gene Arganosa, Brent Barlow, Jaret Horner, Devini de Silva, Stacey Wagenhoffer, Kevin Mikituk, Yong Liu, Carmen Breitkreutz, Anoja Weerasinghe, Dayna Raymond

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGenetically Modified Organisms Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersSaskatchewan Pulse GrowersMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsField peaField (mathematics)BiologyAgronomyMathematicsCrop

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CDC Huskie, a green cotyledon field pea ( Pisum sativum L.) cultivar, was released in 2022 by the Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, for distribution to Select seed growers through the Variety Release Committee of the Saskatchewan Pulse Growers. CDC Huskie has good lodging resistance, medium-sized round seeds, a mean seed protein concentration of 23.3%, and good yielding ability. It is resistant to powdery mildew and moderately susceptible to Mycosphaerella blight and Fusarium root rot. CDC Huskie is adapted to the field pea growing regions of western Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicGenetically Modified Organisms ResearchFrench-language works237,207