Playful Art-Making and a Responsive Adult to Sustain Interest and Affirm Minoritized Children’s Experiences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Young children’s play and art-making expressions are widely recognized to function as constructions of their personal lives and can reveal salient aspects from their sociocultural contexts, funds of knowledge, and situations of development. Minoritized children require access to familiar and culturally representative materials and pedagogies in the classroom to draw on and enact elements of their lives; however, many lack these opportunities in their classrooms. This article draws on findings from an art-informed and play-based case study with young immigrant children in Canada to illustrate how culturally responsive practices, particularly through art-making opportunities and a supportive adult, can draw out the complexities, differences, and multiplicities of young minoritized children’s lived experiences. Better understandings of responsive pedagogical practices are needed in early years, as minoritized young children frequently have their experiences and perspectives dismissed or erased in the pursuit of adapting and becoming proficient as the dominant norms, culture, and practices of the school.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".