MoCo: Urban User Mobile Contact Detection Based on Cellular Signaling Trace
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mobile contact exhibits user co-traveling events within the same transportation tool, which is crucial for resident profiling, face-to-face interaction detection, etc. In this paper, we investigate urban user mobile contact detection with cellular signaling traces, which is cost-efficient to enable large-scale detection. Specifically, we develop a data collection platform to collect substantial user signaling traces, covering different types of road scenarios within a city. With the collected traces, we perform systematic data analysis to reveal several technical challenges, which are sparsity of signaling trajectory, remote base station noise, and fuzzy matching difficulties. To address challenges, we propose a mobile contact detection method named <monospace xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">MoCo</monospace>. In <monospace xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">MoCo</monospace> framework, we first conduct data denoising to remove the noise from remote base stations. Then, we devise a spatio-temporal filter to eliminate unlikely mobile contact traces in both spatial and temporal domains, reducing the computational overhead. Finally, we design a detection network that integrates the submodules of data alignment, feature encoder, spatio-temporal representation learner, and user mobile contact detector. Extensive evaluation results demonstrate the superiority of <monospace xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">MoCo</monospace> in comparison with state-of-the-art baselines. Robust experiments show that <monospace xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">MoCo</monospace> can work efficiently in different transportation modes and urban densities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".