MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407901363 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0314254

Combined immunoinformatic approaches with computational biochemistry for development of subunit-based vaccine against Lawsonia intracellularis

2025· article· en· W4407901363 on OpenAlexaff
Zahed Khatooni, Gordon Broderick, Sanjeev K. Anand, Heather L. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary medicine and infectious diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawsonia intracellularisHomology modelingEpitopeMolecular mechanicsBiologyDocking (animal)Computational biologyIn silicoVirulenceChemistryMolecular dynamicsBiochemistryGeneticsMicrobiologyGeneComputational chemistryAntigen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lawsonia intracellularis (LI) are obligate intracellular bacteria and the causative agent of proliferative hemorrhagic enteropathy that significantly impacts the health of piglets and the profitability of the swine industry. In this study, we used immunoinformatic and computational methodologies such as homology modelling, molecular docking, molecular dynamic (MD) simulation, and free energy calculations in a novel three stage approach to identify strong T and B cell epitopes in the LI proteome. From ∼ 1342 LI proteins, we narrowed our focus to 256 proteins that were either not well-identified (unknown role) or were expressed at a higher frequency in pathogenic strains relative to non-pathogenic strains. At stage 1, these proteins were analyzed for predicted virulence, antigenicity, solubility, and probability of residing within a membrane. At stage 2, we used NetMHCPan4-1 to identify over ten thousand cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitopes (CTLEs) and 286 CTLEs were ranked as having high predicted binding affinity for the SLA-1 and SLA-2 complexes. At stage 3, we used homology modeling to predict the structures of the top ranked CTLEs and we subjected each of them to molecular docking analysis with SLA-1*0401 and SLA-2*0402. The top ranked 25 SLA-CTLE complexes were selected to be an input for subsequent MD simulations to fully investigate the atomic-level dynamics of proteins under the natural thermal fluctuation of water and thus potentially provide deep insight into the CTLE-SLA interaction. We also performed free energy evaluation by Molecular Mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area to predict epitope interactions and binding affinities to the SLA-1 and SLA-2. We identified the top five CTLEs having the strongest binding energy to the indicated SLAs (-305.6 kJ/mol, -219.5 kJ/mol, -214.8 kJ/mol, -139.5 kJ/mol and -92.6 kJ/mol, respectively.) W also performed B-cell epitope prediction and the top-ranked 5 CTLEs and 3 B-cell epitopes were organized into a multi-epitope subunit antigen vaccine construct joined using EAAAK, AAY, KK, and GGGGG linkers with 40 residues of the LI DnaK protein attached to the N-terminus to further enhance the antigenicity of the vaccine construct. Blind docking studies showed strong interactions between our vaccine construct with swine Toll-like receptor 5. Collectively, these molecular modeling and immunoinformatic analyses present a useful in silico protocol for the discovery of candidate antigen in many viral and bacterial pathogens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONESame topicVeterinary medicine and infectious diseasesFrench-language works237,207