MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Triple-band Antenna Dielectric Resonator-based for Millimeter-wave and Sub-6 Applications

2024· article· en· W4407901623 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Sedigh Bizan, Tayeb A. Denidni

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtremely high frequencyDielectric resonator antennaDielectricDielectric resonatorResonatorAntenna (radio)OptoelectronicsMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsPhysicsComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents a novel triple-band dielectric resonator antenna (DRA) tailored for millimeter-wave (mm-wave) and microwave GHz applications. The design features three main elements: a cylindrical dielectric resonator (CDR) for the mm-wave range, activated by a slot in the ground, and two ring-shaped dielectric resonators (RDRs) for the Sub-6 GHz range, each powered by vertical microstrip lines. Low-pass filters (LPFs) are embedded in each RDR to suppress undesirable resonances in the mm-wave band. The CDR is fine-tuned for 28 GHz operation, reaching a gain of 17.8 dBi and a bandwidth of 17.3%. The larger RDR operates at 2.4 GHz, delivering a gain of 7.5 dBi and a bandwidth of 26.9%, while the smaller RDR functions at 5.2 GHz, with a gain of 5.3 dBi and a bandwidth of 17.2%. The antenna demonstrates outstanding isolation, surpassing 30 dB in all bands, making it an ideal candidate for 5G systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides→French-language works237,207→