MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407902324 · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2025.160928

Switchable biomaterials for wastewater treatment: From material innovations to technological advancements

2025· article· en· W4407902324 on OpenAlexafffund
Hongjie Wang, Xiujuan Chen, Bing Chen, Min Yang, Baiyu Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Engineering Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMembrane Separation Technologies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsWastewaterSewage treatmentNanotechnologyBiochemical engineeringMaterials scienceProcess engineeringEngineeringWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Existing studies on switchable biomaterials for wastewater treatment are reviewed. • Switchable biomaterials offer sustainable and cost-effective solutions for wastewater treatment. • The stimulus-responsive properties of switchable biomaterials significantly enhance material recyclability. • Switchable cellulose is promising for large-scale practical applications. • Most of the current switchable biomaterials remain challenges in mechanical strength. Switchable biomaterials have emerged as promising solutions for sustainable and cost-effective wastewater treatment, leveraging stimuli-responsive functionalities for efficient pollutant removal and material recyclability. This review explores the applications and challenges of chitosan, polylactic acid (PLA), cellulose, biochar, rubber, resin, and crude fibers, emphasizing their adsorption capacities, stability, and scalability. Switchable cellulose materials, widely used in dye removal and oil–water separation, exhibit adsorption capacities of 10–52 g/g, yet require mechanical reinforcement for harsh wastewater environments. Heteroatom-doped biochar, with high surface areas (>500 m 2 /g) and porosities, achieves heavy metal adsorption efficiencies exceeding 90%, though feedstock variability affects consistency. Functionalized rubber, resin, and fibers demonstrate over 90% oil–water separation efficiency, benefiting from tunable surface properties and self-cleaning abilities. Despite these advantages, challenges remain in enhancing scalability, recyclability, and multi-contaminant adaptability. While mild regeneration methods, such as CO 2 bubbling and pH adjustments, reduce energy demands, synthesis processes still require optimization for industrial viability. Future efforts should focus on hybrid biomaterials, low-energy synthesis techniques, and integration into existing treatment systems to maximize their long-term sustainability and real-world impact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical Engineering JournalSame topicMembrane Separation TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207