MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407902397 · doi:10.3390/w17050660

Modeling the Nexus of Climate Change and Deforestation: Implications for the Blue Water Resources of the Jari River, Amazonia

2025· article· en· W4407902397 on OpenAlexaff
Paulo Ricardo Rufino, Björn Gücker, Martin Völk, Michael Strauch, Francielle da Silva Cardozo, Iola G. Boëchat, Monireh Faramarzi, Gabriel Pereira

Bibliographic record

VenueWater · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas GeraisConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsAmazon rainforestNexus (standard)Deforestation (computer science)Climate changeEnvironmental scienceWater resourcesWater resource managementGeographyForestryHydrology (agriculture)Environmental protectionAgroforestryGeologyEcologyOceanographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deforestation and agricultural practices, such as livestock farming, disrupt biogeochemical cycles, contribute to climate change, and can lead to serious environmental problems. Understanding the water cycle and changes in discharge patterns at the watershed scale is essential to tracking how deforestation affects the flow to downstream water bodies and the ocean. The Amazon basin, which provides about 15–20% of the freshwater flowing into the oceans, is one of the most important river systems in the world. Despite this, it is increasingly suffering from anthropogenic pressure, mainly from converting rainforests to agricultural and livestock areas, which can drive global warming and ecosystem instability. In this study, we applied a calibrated Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model to the Jari River Watershed, a part of the Brazilian Amazon, to assess the combined effects of deforestation and climate change on water resources between 2020 and 2050. The model was calibrated and validated using observed streamflow. The results show an NS of 0.85 and 0.89, PBIAS of −9.5 and −0.6, p-factor of 0.84 and 0.93, and r-factor of 0.84 and 0.78, for periods of calibration and validation, respectively, indicating a strong model performance. We analyzed four scenarios that examined different levels of deforestation and climate change. Our results suggest that deforestation and climate change could increase surface runoff by 18 mm, while groundwater recharge could vary between declines of −20 mm and increases of 120 mm. These changes could amplify streamflow variability, affect its dynamics, intensify flood risks, and reduce water availability during dry periods, leading to significant risks for the hydrology of Amazonian watersheds and human water supply. This, in turn, could profoundly impact the region’s megadiverse flora and fauna, which directly depend on balanced streamflow in the watersheds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWaterSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207